Mothering through breastfeeding is the
most natural and effective way of understanding and satisfying
the needs of the baby.
When I think of what is entailed in mothering, I think of loving
the baby – of caring for the baby physically, emotionally
and spiritually. It wasn’t that I thought I couldn’t
mother by bottle-feeding; it simply seemed that breastfeeding
was so clearly what Hannah needed and what I was preprogrammed
to do.
‘Mothering through breastfeeding’. One of the very
obvious things that strikes me about the phrase is how
inextricably linked, physiologically, breastfeeding and pregnancy
are, in that the body starts preparing for breastfeeding as soon
as the woman becomes pregnant. Nothing could be more natural
and to not breastfeed is to go against nature. Similarly, the
development of the baby’s sucking reflex in utero and its
rooting instinct prepare it to be mothered through breastfeeding.
It also is the only thing that only I can do, short of a wet
nurse, which seems to me to point to its being at the heart of
mothering the baby. It was also the only thing I knew I could
(eventually) do well by virtue of simply being Hannah’s
mother and that was a huge comfort to me. I was taken aback at
how strong my determination to breastfeed was – my belief
that it was absolutely essential for Hannah’s well-being
and that I would persist no matter how painful it was. Perhaps
this was hormonally influenced. That Hannah knew exactly how
to extract the milk she wanted, cracked or inverted nipples or
not seemed miraculous to me.
That breastfeeding is an effective way of meeting the needs
of the baby seems to be proved by the fact that a baby survives
and thrives on nothing more than breast milk for at least its
first six months. Even though I had early difficulties with breastfeeding
Hannah regained her birth weight quickly and has had few ailments. |
As far as understanding the needs of the baby
is concerned, breastfeeding Hannah reinforced and enhanced the
bond between us even though in the worst moments of the early days
it felt at times as though it was weakening it. When breastfeeding
started to go well for us, the bond became much stronger on my
side. It was a continuation of the physical and emotional connectedness
that had begun in pregnancy.
With regards to satisfying the needs of the baby, the let-down
reflex when the baby cries seems significant. The mother’s
body doesn’t distinguish between physiological and emotional
needs. That Hannah stopped crying when I breastfed her confirmed
to me (rightly or wrongly) that her needs were being satisfied.
I’m not sure that my understanding of those needs progressed
much beyond that, especially around the stomach upsets, but the
contentment that breastfeeding brought Hannah when she was distressed
was and continues to be tangible. It wasn’t that we didn’t
try other methods to comfort her when she was crying with her
stomach ructions. We walked up and down for hours, sang soothingly,
drove for miles. Nothing else worked for any length of time.
It would seem logical that breastfeeding on demand helps the
baby to trust its own instincts and environment and that trust
must help the baby to feel secure in itself and in the world.
Conversely, if the baby cries - to express a need in the only
way it can - and is ignored, then it would seem logically to
lead to a distrust of the baby’s carers and environment.
The psychological need for security, that knowing one is loved,
seems to be met at least partly through breastfeeding.
Breastfeeding satisfies the physiological needs and seems also
to meet the psychological needs of the baby. Nutritionally, it
is unsurpassed; it provides immunological protection and the
physical closeness of skin-to-skin contact.
Liz Lightfoot, Chartwell Group Hamilton
AROHA January - February 2003 Volume 5 Issue 1
<< return to information
submenu |